Supreme Court Criticizes UP for Converting Civil Matters into Criminal Cases
The Supreme Court of India has strongly criticized the Uttar Pradesh Police for the practice of converting civil disputes into criminal cases, terming it a “complete breakdown of the rule of law” in the state. This criticism came during a hearing where a lawyer argued that an FIR was lodged because civil disputes take too long to resolve.
Rule of Law Breakdown: The Supreme Court stated that converting civil matters into criminal cases is unacceptable and represents a complete breakdown of the rule of law in Uttar Pradesh.
Civil vs. Criminal Cases: The court emphasized that merely not giving money cannot be turned into an offense, highlighting the distinction between civil and criminal matters.
Directions to UP Police: The court directed the Director General of Police and a Station House Officer in Gautam Budh Nagar district to submit affidavits explaining why criminal proceedings were initiated in a civil matter.
Compliance and Consequences: The court warned that costs may be imposed on the state if this practice continues and may initiate contempt proceedings against investigating officers for non-compliance with earlier court directions.
Specific Case Details: The case involved charges of criminal breach of trust, intimidation, and conspiracy, alongside proceedings for cheque dishonour under the Negotiable Instruments Act.
The Supreme Court’s criticism highlights a significant issue in the legal system of Uttar Pradesh, where civil disputes are frequently being criminalized. This trend not only undermines the rule of law but also burdens the criminal justice system with cases that should ideally be resolved through civil means. The court’s actions aim to ensure compliance with legal procedures and maintain the integrity of the judicial process.
