CID Calls Abhishek Banerjee for Second Round of Questioning in MLA Signature Forgery Case
West Bengal Investigation Intensifies as Trinamool Congress Leader Asked to Appear Again in Alleged Forgery Probe
The Criminal Investigation Department (CID) has summoned Abhishek Banerjee for a second round of questioning in connection with an alleged MLA signature forgery case, marking a significant development in an investigation that has attracted considerable political attention in West Bengal.
According to officials, the fresh summons follows the agency’s review of documents and statements collected during the earlier phase of the investigation. Investigators are reportedly seeking further clarification on issues that emerged after examining evidence and witness testimonies. The CID has maintained that the questioning forms part of its ongoing fact-finding process and should not be construed as a determination of guilt.
The case centers on allegations that the signature of a Member of the Legislative Assembly (MLA) was forged on official documents. Authorities are investigating how the disputed documents were prepared, who may have been involved in their creation or use, and whether any criminal offences under applicable laws were committed. The authenticity of the signatures and related records remains a key aspect of the inquiry.
Abhishek Banerjee has previously cooperated with investigators and has consistently denied any wrongdoing. Leaders of the All India Trinamool Congress have described the allegations as politically motivated and asserted that the party has nothing to hide. They have stated that Banerjee will continue to cooperate with lawful investigations while contesting what they characterize as attempts to target opposition leaders.
Opposition parties, meanwhile, have argued that the investigation should proceed independently and that all relevant individuals should be questioned to ensure accountability. They have called for a transparent inquiry based solely on evidence rather than political considerations.
Legal experts note that a second round of questioning is not unusual in complex investigations. As new documents, digital evidence, or witness statements emerge, investigators may recall individuals to clarify inconsistencies, verify timelines, or confront them with additional material. Such questioning is part of the investigative process and does not by itself establish criminal liability.
The CID is expected to continue examining documentary and forensic evidence before deciding on any further legal action. Until the investigation is completed, no final conclusions have been reached regarding the allegations, and the matter remains subject to the outcome of the ongoing inquiry and any subsequent judicial proceedings.
