US wants nuclear deal ‘as soon as possible but it won’t be easy’, says Iran after high-stakes talks begin
The United States and Iran have resumed high-stakes discussions aimed at reaching a new nuclear agreement, marking the most significant engagement between the two nations since the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) was abandoned by the U.S. in 2018. The talks, held in Muscat, Oman, were described as “constructive” by both sides, with further negotiations scheduled for April 19. However, Iranian officials have cautioned that while progress is possible, achieving a deal will be challenging due to the complexity of the issues involved and mutual distrust.
U.S. Position: President Donald Trump has emphasized the urgency of securing a stronger agreement than the 2015 deal, which he previously criticized as inadequate. He has warned of potential military action if Iran does not comply with demands to dismantle its nuclear program entirely. U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff reiterated that any deal must ensure Iran cannot weaponize its nuclear capabilities.
Iran’s Stance: Iran has expressed willingness to negotiate but insists on maintaining an “honorable” and “fair” agreement. Tehran has rejected discussions under pressure or threats and has set clear “red lines,” including refusing to address its ballistic missile program or regional alliances during these talks. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi emphasized that Iran seeks a swift resolution but warned against prolonged or unproductive negotiations.
Indirect Talks: Despite initial calls for direct negotiations by the U.S., Iran insisted on indirect discussions mediated by Oman. A brief face-to-face interaction between Araghchi and Witkoff was noted but downplayed by Iranian officials to avoid backlash from domestic hardliners.
Challenges Ahead:
Diverging Objectives: The U.S. demands complete dismantling of Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, while Iran seeks sanctions relief without compromising its sovereignty or regional influence.
Regional Tensions: Israel’s advocacy for military action against Iran and ongoing conflicts involving Iranian allies add complexity to the negotiations.
Economic Pressures: Iran’s economy remains under strain from U.S.-imposed sanctions, which Tehran views as leverage to push for concessions from Washington.
Both parties have acknowledged the significance of these talks but recognize that achieving a comprehensive agreement will require substantial compromise and trust-building measures. The next round of discussions will be crucial in determining whether a pathway to resolution is feasible.
